treatise De Cibis Judaicis
E845998
The treatise *De Cibis Judaicis* is a theological work, traditionally attributed to the early Christian theologian Novatian, that interprets Old Testament Jewish dietary laws in a Christian, allegorical framework.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| De Cibis Judaicis | 1 |
| treatise De Cibis Judaicis canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T10170401 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: treatise De Cibis Judaicis Context triple: [Novatian, knownFor, treatise De Cibis Judaicis]
-
A.
Hilchot Ma’akhalot Asurot
Hilchot Ma’akhalot Asurot is the section of Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah that systematically codifies the Jewish laws governing forbidden foods and dietary prohibitions.
-
B.
Commentary on the Jerusalem Talmud
Commentary on the Jerusalem Talmud is a renowned scholarly work by the Vilna Gaon offering incisive elucidations and emendations on the often cryptic text of the Jerusalem Talmud.
-
C.
Ketzot HaChoshen
Ketzot HaChoshen is a classic and highly influential halachic work of analytical commentary on Jewish civil law, renowned for its depth and sharp legal reasoning.
-
D.
Commentary on the Mishnah
Commentary on the Mishnah is a foundational rabbinic work by Maimonides that systematically explains and interprets the entire Mishnah, shaping subsequent Jewish legal and philosophical thought.
-
E.
Adversus Judaeos
Adversus Judaeos is a polemical theological treatise by Theodulf of Orléans that argues against Jewish beliefs from a Christian perspective in the early Middle Ages.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: treatise De Cibis Judaicis Target entity description: The treatise *De Cibis Judaicis* is a theological work, traditionally attributed to the early Christian theologian Novatian, that interprets Old Testament Jewish dietary laws in a Christian, allegorical framework.
-
A.
Hilchot Ma’akhalot Asurot
Hilchot Ma’akhalot Asurot is the section of Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah that systematically codifies the Jewish laws governing forbidden foods and dietary prohibitions.
-
B.
Commentary on the Jerusalem Talmud
Commentary on the Jerusalem Talmud is a renowned scholarly work by the Vilna Gaon offering incisive elucidations and emendations on the often cryptic text of the Jerusalem Talmud.
-
C.
Ketzot HaChoshen
Ketzot HaChoshen is a classic and highly influential halachic work of analytical commentary on Jewish civil law, renowned for its depth and sharp legal reasoning.
-
D.
Commentary on the Mishnah
Commentary on the Mishnah is a foundational rabbinic work by Maimonides that systematically explains and interprets the entire Mishnah, shaping subsequent Jewish legal and philosophical thought.
-
E.
Adversus Judaeos
Adversus Judaeos is a polemical theological treatise by Theodulf of Orléans that argues against Jewish beliefs from a Christian perspective in the early Middle Ages.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Latin treatise
ⓘ
patristic text ⓘ theological treatise ⓘ |
| aimsTo | explain Jewish dietary laws to Christians ⓘ |
| approachToLaw | spiritualization of ceremonial precepts ⓘ |
| associatedWith | Novatianist tradition ⓘ |
| attributedTo | Novatian NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| audience | early Christian readers ⓘ |
| category |
early Christian literature
ⓘ
patristic exegesis ⓘ |
| centuryOfComposition | 3rd century (traditional attribution) ⓘ |
| concerns |
Christian understanding of Jewish ritual law
ⓘ
continuity and discontinuity between Judaism and Christianity ⓘ |
| discusses |
purity and impurity
ⓘ
symbolic meaning of animals in Scripture ⓘ |
| doctrinalTheme |
Christian interpretation of Mosaic Law
ⓘ
relationship between Old and New Covenants ⓘ |
| field |
Christian ethics
ⓘ
biblical exegesis ⓘ dogmatic theology ⓘ |
| focusesOn | Levitical dietary regulations ⓘ |
| genre | theological exegesis ⓘ |
| hermeneuticApproach | spiritual interpretation of legal prescriptions ⓘ |
| interpretationMethod |
allegorical
ⓘ
typological ⓘ |
| language | Latin ⓘ |
| literaryForm | prose treatise ⓘ |
| preservedIn | Latin patristic manuscript tradition ⓘ |
| relatedWorkByTraditionalAuthor |
De Bono Pudicitiae
GENERATED
ⓘ
De Spectaculis GENERATED ⓘ De Trinitate GENERATED ⓘ |
| religiousContext | Christianity ⓘ |
| scripturalBasis | Mosaic dietary commandments ⓘ |
| subject |
Jewish food laws
ⓘ
Old Testament dietary laws NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| theologicalTradition | Latin patristic theology ⓘ |
| title | De Cibis Judaicis NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| traditionalAuthor | Novatian NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| treatsAs | Christian moral symbols ⓘ |
| usesSourceText |
Leviticus
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Old Testament NERFINISHED ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: treatise De Cibis Judaicis Description of subject: The treatise *De Cibis Judaicis* is a theological work, traditionally attributed to the early Christian theologian Novatian, that interprets Old Testament Jewish dietary laws in a Christian, allegorical framework.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.