doctrine of discovery in U.S. law

E838790

The doctrine of discovery in U.S. law is a legal principle, rooted in European colonial-era claims and articulated in early Supreme Court decisions, that granted European-descended governments superior title to lands over Indigenous peoples and sharply limited Native land rights and sovereignty.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf colonial-era legal principle
legal doctrine
principle of federal Indian law
appliesInJurisdiction United States NERFINISHED
articulatedBy Chief Justice John Marshall NERFINISHED
articulatedIn Johnson v. M’Intosh NERFINISHED
articulatedInYear 1823
conceptuallyRelatedTo plenary power doctrine
terra nullius
trust doctrine in U.S. Indian law
continuesToInfluence land claims litigation
modern federal Indian law jurisprudence
sovereignty and jurisdiction disputes
coreIdea European Christian nations acquired superior title to lands they discovered
Indigenous nations could not freely sell land to private parties without federal consent
Indigenous peoples retained only limited occupancy rights
discovering sovereign held exclusive right of preemption to purchase Indigenous lands
ultimate dominion vested in the discovering sovereign
criticizedBy Indigenous scholars
human rights advocates
some legal historians
criticizedFor entrenching colonial domination
racial discrimination against Indigenous peoples
violating Indigenous sovereignty
definesStatusOf Native American land titles
tribal property rights
hasLongTermImpactOn federal-tribal relations
recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in the United States
tribal land dispossession
hasOriginIn Christian European imperialism
European colonial expansion NERFINISHED
historicalContext early 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court nation-building
post-Revolution adoption of British colonial legal principles
influencedBy European international law of the Age of Discovery NERFINISHED
papal bulls of the 15th century
legalEffect concentration of ultimate title in the federal government
denial of full underlying title to Indigenous nations
restriction of Indigenous power to alienate land
support for federal supremacy over states and tribes in land matters
limits Indigenous land rights
Indigenous sovereignty
normativelyChallengedBy Indigenous rights movements in North America
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples NERFINISHED
partOf Marshall Trilogy NERFINISHED
relatedCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia NERFINISHED
Worcester v. Georgia NERFINISHED
usedFor justifying U.S. territorial expansion
supporting federal plenary power over Indian affairs

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Marshall Trilogy establishesDoctrine doctrine of discovery in U.S. law