Ontological argument for the existence of God
E835265
The ontological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical proof that attempts to demonstrate God's existence purely through reason and the concept of a maximally perfect being, without relying on empirical evidence.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Ontological argument for the existence of God canonical | 1 |
| Proposition 11 (God necessarily exists) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T10023968 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ontological argument for the existence of God Context triple: [Proslogion, hasPart, Ontological argument for the existence of God]
-
A.
Existence of God
The Existence of God refers to the theological and philosophical assertion that a single, ultimate, and necessary divine being underlies and governs all reality.
-
B.
The Existence of God
The Existence of God is a major work of analytic philosophy of religion in which Richard Swinburne presents a detailed, probabilistic argument for the rationality of believing in God’s existence.
-
C.
36 Arguments for the Existence of God
36 Arguments for the Existence of God is a philosophical novel by Rebecca Goldstein that intertwines satire, intellectual debate, and emotional narrative to explore faith, reason, and the nature of belief.
-
D.
The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz
The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz is a scholarly work by philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig that traces and analyzes the historical development of cosmological arguments for the existence of God from ancient Greek thought through early modern philosophy.
-
E.
Gödel's ontological proof
Gödel's ontological proof is a formal, modal-logic-based argument for the existence of God that rigorously develops and refines earlier ontological arguments within a precise axiomatic framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ontological argument for the existence of God Target entity description: The ontological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical proof that attempts to demonstrate God's existence purely through reason and the concept of a maximally perfect being, without relying on empirical evidence.
-
A.
Existence of God
The Existence of God refers to the theological and philosophical assertion that a single, ultimate, and necessary divine being underlies and governs all reality.
-
B.
The Existence of God
The Existence of God is a major work of analytic philosophy of religion in which Richard Swinburne presents a detailed, probabilistic argument for the rationality of believing in God’s existence.
-
C.
36 Arguments for the Existence of God
36 Arguments for the Existence of God is a philosophical novel by Rebecca Goldstein that intertwines satire, intellectual debate, and emotional narrative to explore faith, reason, and the nature of belief.
-
D.
The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz
The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz is a scholarly work by philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig that traces and analyzes the historical development of cosmological arguments for the existence of God from ancient Greek thought through early modern philosophy.
-
E.
Gödel's ontological proof
Gödel's ontological proof is a formal, modal-logic-based argument for the existence of God that rigorously develops and refines earlier ontological arguments within a precise axiomatic framework.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
a priori argument
ⓘ
argument for the existence of God ⓘ deductive argument ⓘ philosophical argument ⓘ |
| aimsToShow | God exists ⓘ |
| associatedWith | Anselm of Canterbury NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| basedOn |
concept of God
ⓘ
modal reasoning ⓘ |
| centralConcept |
existence as a perfection
ⓘ
maximally perfect being ⓘ necessary being ⓘ |
| criticizedBy |
Bertrand Russell
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
David Hume NERFINISHED ⓘ Gaunilo of Marmoutiers NERFINISHED ⓘ Immanuel Kant NERFINISHED ⓘ J. L. Mackie NERFINISHED ⓘ Thomas Aquinas NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| developedIn | medieval Christian philosophy ⓘ |
| doesNotRelyOn | empirical evidence ⓘ |
| famousCritique |
Gaunilo’s perfect island objection
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Hume’s skepticism about a priori existence proofs ⓘ Kant’s claim that existence is not a predicate ⓘ |
| field |
metaphysics
ⓘ
philosophical theology ⓘ philosophy of religion ⓘ |
| firstFormulatedBy | Anselm of Canterbury NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| firstMajorPresentation | Proslogion GENERATED ⓘ |
| hasVersion |
Anselm’s ontological argument
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Descartes’ ontological argument NERFINISHED ⓘ Gödel’s ontological proof NERFINISHED ⓘ Hartshorne’s ontological argument NERFINISHED ⓘ Leibniz’s ontological argument NERFINISHED ⓘ Norman Malcolm’s ontological argument NERFINISHED ⓘ Plantinga’s modal ontological argument NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | 11th century ⓘ |
| influenced | modern analytic philosophy of religion ⓘ |
| influencedBy | Augustinian theology NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| involves |
comparison of possible and actual existence
ⓘ
definition of God as the greatest conceivable being ⓘ |
| keyNotion |
analytic truth
ⓘ
conceptual analysis ⓘ maximal greatness ⓘ necessary existence ⓘ perfection ⓘ possible worlds ⓘ |
| logicalForm |
modal logic argument
ⓘ
reductio ad absurdum ⓘ |
| statusInPhilosophy |
highly controversial
ⓘ
widely discussed ⓘ |
| supports | classical theism ⓘ |
| uses | pure reason ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Ontological argument for the existence of God Description of subject: The ontological argument for the existence of God is a philosophical proof that attempts to demonstrate God's existence purely through reason and the concept of a maximally perfect being, without relying on empirical evidence.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Proposition 11 (God necessarily exists)