sentencing remarks in R v Poumako

E802294

The sentencing remarks in R v Poumako are a significant New Zealand judicial decision by Dame Sian Elias that critically examined the application of retrospective criminal legislation and minimum sentencing provisions.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (40)

Predicate Object
instanceOf judicial decision
legal opinion
sentencing remarks
appliesPrinciple presumption against retrospectivity
strict construction of penal statutes
appliesToCase R v Poumako NERFINISHED
author Dame Sian Elias NERFINISHED
citationJurisdiction New Zealand courts NERFINISHED
concernsOffenceType serious violent offending
considers fairness in sentencing
parliamentary intention behind minimum sentences
principle against retrospectivity in criminal law
country New Zealand
court High Court of New Zealand NERFINISHED
criticises retrospective application of minimum sentencing provisions
examines application of retrospective criminal legislation
operation of minimum sentencing provisions
judge Dame Sian Elias NERFINISHED
jurisdiction New Zealand
language English
legalArea criminal law
sentencing law
legalIssue interpretation of sentencing legislation
mandatory minimum sentences
minimum sentencing provisions
non‑retroactivity of criminal law
retrospective criminal legislation
legalSystem New Zealand common law
legalSystemConcept rule of law
separation of powers
partOf R v Poumako NERFINISHED
presidingJudge Dame Sian Elias NERFINISHED
relatedToConcept human rights in criminal justice
judicial discretion in sentencing
relatedToStatute New Zealand sentencing legislation
significance important New Zealand authority on retrospective criminal legislation
influential in debates on minimum sentencing in New Zealand
typeOfDecision sentencing decision
usedAsPrecedentFor interpretation of retrospective sentencing provisions
limits on retrospective criminal punishment

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Dame Sian Elias notableWork sentencing remarks in R v Poumako