Beijing Consensus

E778438

The Beijing Consensus is a development model associated with China that emphasizes state-led economic growth, gradual reform, and political non-interference as an alternative to Western-style market liberalization and democratization.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf development model
economic development paradigm
political-economic concept
alternativeTo Washington Consensus NERFINISHED
associatedWith Chinese economic reforms
Chinese government NERFINISHED
contrastsWith market fundamentalism
political conditionality on aid and investment
rapid market liberalization
countryOfOrigin China
criticizedFor lack of political liberalization
lack of transparency
supporting authoritarian regimes
weak protection of civil liberties
debatedIn development studies
international political economy literature
emphasizes authoritarian or one-party political structures
export-led growth
gradual reform
industrial policy
infrastructure investment
non-interference in domestic affairs
political stability
pragmatic experimentation
sovereignty
state ownership in key sectors
state-led economic growth
strong role of the state in the economy
hasAspect emphasis on economic growth over political reform
emphasis on national development goals
flexible policy toolkit
focus on long-term planning
influences debates on global governance
development strategies in some Global South countries
foreign policy approaches of China
perceivedAs challenge to Western liberal order
model for authoritarian modernization
relatedTo Belt and Road Initiative NERFINISHED
Chinese model of development
South–South cooperation NERFINISHED
authoritarian capitalism
state capitalism
supports capital controls or managed capital flows
incremental policy change
policy experimentation at local levels
state guidance of markets
timePeriod post-Cold War era
usedBy some policymakers in developing countries

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Washington Consensus contrastedWith Beijing Consensus