ICJ General List No. 132
E760037
ICJ General List No. 132 is the docket number assigned by the International Court of Justice to the 2009 case concerning the dispute between Romania and Ukraine over maritime delimitation in the Black Sea.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| ICJ General List No. 132 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8833775 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ICJ General List No. 132 Context triple: [International Court of Justice ruling of 2009, caseNumber, ICJ General List No. 132]
-
A.
Registry of the International Court of Justice
The Registry of the International Court of Justice is the Court’s permanent administrative and judicial support organ, responsible for managing its proceedings, records, and communications.
-
B.
Registry of the International Criminal Court
The Registry of the International Criminal Court is the administrative organ responsible for the Court’s non-judicial functions, including support to judges, counsel, victims, and witnesses, and the overall management of court services.
-
C.
Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice
The Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice is a smaller, specially constituted body of the Court designed to handle certain cases more expeditiously than the full bench.
-
D.
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court
The Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court was a UN body tasked with drafting and negotiating the foundational legal framework that led to the creation of the International Criminal Court.
-
E.
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: ICJ General List No. 132 Target entity description: ICJ General List No. 132 is the docket number assigned by the International Court of Justice to the 2009 case concerning the dispute between Romania and Ukraine over maritime delimitation in the Black Sea.
-
A.
Registry of the International Court of Justice
The Registry of the International Court of Justice is the Court’s permanent administrative and judicial support organ, responsible for managing its proceedings, records, and communications.
-
B.
Registry of the International Criminal Court
The Registry of the International Criminal Court is the administrative organ responsible for the Court’s non-judicial functions, including support to judges, counsel, victims, and witnesses, and the overall management of court services.
-
C.
Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice
The Chamber of Summary Procedure of the International Court of Justice is a smaller, specially constituted body of the Court designed to handle certain cases more expeditiously than the full bench.
-
D.
Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court
The Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court was a UN body tasked with drafting and negotiating the foundational legal framework that led to the creation of the International Criminal Court.
-
E.
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
International Court of Justice case docket number
ⓘ
case concerning maritime delimitation ⓘ |
| applicantState | Romania NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| bindingOnParties | yes ⓘ |
| caseCategory | contentious case ⓘ |
| caseNumberingSystem | ICJ General List NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| countryOfCourt | Netherlands NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| court | International Court of Justice NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 2009-02-03 ⓘ |
| decisionType | judgment on the merits ⓘ |
| disputeType |
maritime boundary dispute
ⓘ
maritime delimitation ⓘ |
| fullCaseName | Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine) NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasOfficialCitation | I.C.J. Reports 2009, p. 61 ⓘ |
| judicialBody | principal judicial organ of the United Nations ⓘ |
| languageOfProceedings |
English
ⓘ
French ⓘ |
| legalInstrumentInvoked |
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
bilateral agreements between Romania and Ukraine ⓘ |
| outcome | maritime boundary delimited by the Court ⓘ |
| party |
Romania
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Ukraine NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| region | Black Sea NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondentState | Ukraine NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| seatOfCourt | The Hague NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| shortCaseName | Romania v. Ukraine NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | maritime delimitation in the Black Sea ⓘ |
| territorialContext |
continental shelf in the Black Sea
ⓘ
exclusive economic zone in the Black Sea ⓘ |
| yearOfJudgment | 2009 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: ICJ General List No. 132 Description of subject: ICJ General List No. 132 is the docket number assigned by the International Court of Justice to the 2009 case concerning the dispute between Romania and Ukraine over maritime delimitation in the Black Sea.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.