Warrant trilogy
E726734
The Warrant trilogy is a three-volume series by philosopher Alvin Plantinga that develops a detailed account of epistemic warrant and applies it to debates about knowledge and religious belief.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Warrant trilogy canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8332454 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Warrant trilogy Context triple: [Warrant: The Current Debate, partOfSeries, Warrant trilogy]
-
A.
Aftermath trilogy
The Aftermath trilogy is a series of canon Star Wars novels by Chuck Wendig that chronicles the turbulent events following Return of the Jedi and the fall of the Galactic Empire.
-
B.
Death Warrant
Death Warrant is a 1990 action thriller film starring Jean-Claude Van Damme as an undercover cop investigating murders inside a violent maximum-security prison.
-
C.
Criminal Chambers
Criminal Chambers are specialized judicial bodies within the Supreme Court of Peru responsible for adjudicating serious criminal cases and interpreting criminal law at the highest level.
-
D.
The Trilogy
The Trilogy is a renowned series of three interlinked novels by Samuel Beckett that explore themes of identity, existence, and decay through experimental, minimalist prose.
-
E.
The Trilogy
The Trilogy is a celebrated series of historical novels by Henryk Sienkiewicz that dramatizes 17th-century Polish history through epic battles, patriotism, and romantic adventure.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Warrant trilogy Target entity description: The Warrant trilogy is a three-volume series by philosopher Alvin Plantinga that develops a detailed account of epistemic warrant and applies it to debates about knowledge and religious belief.
-
A.
Aftermath trilogy
The Aftermath trilogy is a series of canon Star Wars novels by Chuck Wendig that chronicles the turbulent events following Return of the Jedi and the fall of the Galactic Empire.
-
B.
Death Warrant
Death Warrant is a 1990 action thriller film starring Jean-Claude Van Damme as an undercover cop investigating murders inside a violent maximum-security prison.
-
C.
Criminal Chambers
Criminal Chambers are specialized judicial bodies within the Supreme Court of Peru responsible for adjudicating serious criminal cases and interpreting criminal law at the highest level.
-
D.
The Trilogy
The Trilogy is a renowned series of three interlinked novels by Samuel Beckett that explore themes of identity, existence, and decay through experimental, minimalist prose.
-
E.
The Trilogy
The Trilogy is a celebrated series of historical novels by Henryk Sienkiewicz that dramatizes 17th-century Polish history through epic battles, patriotism, and romantic adventure.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | philosophical book series ⓘ |
| addresses |
de jure objections to Christian belief
ⓘ
problem of religious disagreement ⓘ rationality of theism ⓘ relationship between faith and reason ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
debates about knowledge
ⓘ
debates about religious belief ⓘ |
| arguesThat |
Christian belief can be warranted
ⓘ
theistic belief can be properly basic ⓘ |
| associatedWith | Reformed epistemology ⓘ |
| author | Alvin Plantinga NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| critiques | internalist theories of justification ⓘ |
| defends | externalist account of warrant ⓘ |
| develops | detailed account of epistemic warrant ⓘ |
| examines |
classical foundationalism
ⓘ
coherentism ⓘ reliabilism ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
nature of knowledge
ⓘ
rationality of religious belief ⓘ relationship between warrant and knowledge ⓘ |
| hasNotableConcept |
design plan of cognitive faculties
ⓘ
properly functioning cognitive faculties in appropriate environment ⓘ warrant as that which turns true belief into knowledge ⓘ |
| hasPart |
Warrant and Proper Function
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Warrant: The Current Debate NERFINISHED ⓘ Warranted Christian Belief NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| influencedField |
contemporary analytic epistemology
ⓘ
philosophy of religion ⓘ |
| introducesConcept | proper function account of warrant ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainTopic |
epistemic warrant
ⓘ
epistemology ⓘ philosophy of religion ⓘ religious epistemology ⓘ |
| numberOfVolumes | 3 ⓘ |
| philosophicalTradition | analytic philosophy NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| publisher | Oxford University Press ⓘ |
| targetAudience |
graduate students in philosophy
ⓘ
professional philosophers ⓘ |
| volume1PublicationYear | 1993 ⓘ |
| volume1Title | Warrant: The Current Debate NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| volume2PublicationYear | 1993 ⓘ |
| volume2Title | Warrant and Proper Function NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| volume3PublicationYear | 2000 ⓘ |
| volume3Title | Warranted Christian Belief NERFINISHED ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Warrant trilogy Description of subject: The Warrant trilogy is a three-volume series by philosopher Alvin Plantinga that develops a detailed account of epistemic warrant and applies it to debates about knowledge and religious belief.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.