Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus

E725378

"Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus" is a scholarly work by philosopher and theologian William Lane Craig that rigorously examines biblical and historical data to argue for the historical credibility of Jesus’ resurrection.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Christian apologetics work
philosophical work
scholarly work
theological work
addresses criteria for historicity in New Testament scholarship
historical reliability of the Gospels
objections to the historicity of the resurrection
aim to argue for the historical credibility of Jesus’ resurrection
argumentType cumulative case argument for the resurrection
author William Lane Craig NERFINISHED
contributesTo debate on the historical Jesus
debate on the resurrection in contemporary theology
examines Gospel passion and resurrection narratives
Pauline resurrection traditions
early Christian proclamation of the resurrection
field Christian theology
New Testament studies NERFINISHED
philosophy of religion
focusesOn New Testament resurrection narratives
biblical data concerning the resurrection
empty tomb traditions
historical data concerning the resurrection
post-resurrection appearances of Jesus
genre academic monograph
intendedAudience Christian apologists
philosophers of religion
scholars
theologians
language English
mainTopic New Testament evidence
historicity of the resurrection
resurrection of Jesus
methodology historical-critical analysis of New Testament texts
philosophical argumentation
positionOnSources treats New Testament documents as historical sources to be critically evaluated
relatedWorkByAuthor Reasonable Faith NERFINISHED
The Son Rises: The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus NERFINISHED
religiousPerspective Christian
religiousTraditionContext Evangelical Christianity NERFINISHED
scholarlyApproach engagement with New Testament scholarship
use of historical criteria such as multiple attestation and embarrassment
supportsPosition the resurrection of Jesus is a historically credible event NERFINISHED
typeOfArgument historical apologetic for Christianity

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

William Lane Craig hasWritten Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus