United States v. Ramirez-Lopez
E709611
United States Court of Appeals case
federal appellate criminal case
illegal reentry prosecution appeal
United States v. Ramirez-Lopez is a federal appellate criminal case known for Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion addressing evidentiary and procedural issues in illegal reentry prosecutions.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Ramirez-Lopez canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8067885 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Ramirez-Lopez Context triple: [Alex Kozinski, notableCaseInvolvement, United States v. Ramirez-Lopez]
-
A.
United States v. Munoz-Flores
United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Ryan
United States v. Ryan is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the landmark 1883 Civil Rights Cases, which curtailed federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
E.
Ocampo v. United States
Ocampo v. United States is a 1914 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied and developed the Insular Cases framework governing constitutional rights in unincorporated American territories.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Ramirez-Lopez Target entity description: United States v. Ramirez-Lopez is a federal appellate criminal case known for Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion addressing evidentiary and procedural issues in illegal reentry prosecutions.
-
A.
United States v. Munoz-Flores
United States v. Munoz-Flores is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether a federal statute imposing monetary assessments on convicted offenders violated the Constitution’s Origination Clause.
-
B.
United States v. Ryan
United States v. Ryan is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that formed part of the landmark 1883 Civil Rights Cases, which curtailed federal enforcement of civil rights protections against private discrimination.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
E.
Ocampo v. United States
Ocampo v. United States is a 1914 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied and developed the Insular Cases framework governing constitutional rights in unincorporated American territories.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Court of Appeals case
ⓘ
federal appellate criminal case ⓘ illegal reentry prosecution appeal ⓘ |
| addresses |
evidentiary issues in illegal reentry prosecutions
ⓘ
procedural issues in illegal reentry prosecutions ⓘ |
| appliesTo | prosecutions for illegal reentry after deportation ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
criminal law
ⓘ
evidence law ⓘ immigration law ⓘ |
| caseType | criminal appeal ⓘ |
| category |
Ninth Circuit criminal law cases
ⓘ
Ninth Circuit immigration-related cases ⓘ federal evidence law cases ⓘ |
| charge | illegal reentry ⓘ |
| circuit | Ninth Circuit NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| citationStatus | published appellate opinion ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| defendant | Ramirez-Lopez NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| involves |
criminal procedure principles
ⓘ
federal rules of evidence NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| knownFor |
Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion on evidentiary and procedural safeguards
ⓘ
analysis of fairness in criminal trial procedures ⓘ discussion of limits on government proof in illegal reentry cases ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
admissibility of government evidence
ⓘ
evidentiary rulings in illegal reentry prosecutions ⓘ fairness of trial procedures ⓘ illegal reentry after deportation ⓘ procedural protections for criminal defendants ⓘ |
| legalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| levelOfCourt | intermediate appellate court ⓘ |
| opinionBy | Alex Kozinski NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| panelJudge | Alex Kozinski NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| party |
Ramirez-Lopez
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| proceduralPosture | appeal from a federal district court conviction ⓘ |
| prosecutionType | federal criminal prosecution ⓘ |
| statutoryContext | illegal reentry statute of the Immigration and Nationality Act ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | federal immigration-related offense ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Ramirez-Lopez Description of subject: United States v. Ramirez-Lopez is a federal appellate criminal case known for Judge Alex Kozinski’s opinion addressing evidentiary and procedural issues in illegal reentry prosecutions.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.