A Reply to Mr. Pitkin
E661629
"A Reply to Mr. Pitkin" is an essay by William James included in his collection *Essays in Radical Empiricism*, in which he defends and clarifies his philosophical position of radical empiricism against contemporary criticism.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| A Reply to Mr. Pitkin canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7411013 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: A Reply to Mr. Pitkin Context triple: [Essays in Radical Empiricism, hasEssay, A Reply to Mr. Pitkin]
-
A.
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
-
B.
Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents
"Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents" is a 1770 political pamphlet by Edmund Burke criticizing the British government's policies and defending constitutional monarchy and party politics.
-
C.
The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles
"The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles" is the alternate title of Federalist No. 39, an essay by James Madison analyzing how the proposed U.S. Constitution aligns with republican ideals and balances federal and national characteristics.
-
D.
Law Against the Formation of New Parties
The Law Against the Formation of New Parties was a Nazi-era statute that effectively established a one-party dictatorship in Germany by outlawing the creation and existence of all political parties other than the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
-
E.
The Gallatin Divergence
The Gallatin Divergence is a libertarian alternate-history science fiction novel by L. Neil Smith that explores a radically different United States shaped by individualist political ideals.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: A Reply to Mr. Pitkin Target entity description: "A Reply to Mr. Pitkin" is an essay by William James included in his collection *Essays in Radical Empiricism*, in which he defends and clarifies his philosophical position of radical empiricism against contemporary criticism.
-
A.
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
-
B.
Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents
"Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents" is a 1770 political pamphlet by Edmund Burke criticizing the British government's policies and defending constitutional monarchy and party politics.
-
C.
The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles
"The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles" is the alternate title of Federalist No. 39, an essay by James Madison analyzing how the proposed U.S. Constitution aligns with republican ideals and balances federal and national characteristics.
-
D.
Law Against the Formation of New Parties
The Law Against the Formation of New Parties was a Nazi-era statute that effectively established a one-party dictatorship in Germany by outlawing the creation and existence of all political parties other than the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
-
E.
The Gallatin Divergence
The Gallatin Divergence is a libertarian alternate-history science fiction novel by L. Neil Smith that explores a radically different United States shaped by individualist political ideals.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (34)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
philosophical essay
ⓘ
work of philosophy ⓘ |
| author | William James NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| clarifies | doctrine of pure experience NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| collectionEditor | William James NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| defendsPosition | radical empiricism ⓘ |
| genre |
essay
ⓘ
philosophy ⓘ |
| hasForm | prose ⓘ |
| hasTitle | A Reply to Mr. Pitkin NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| includedIn | Essays in Radical Empiricism NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
empiricism
ⓘ
epistemology ⓘ metaphysics ⓘ philosophy of experience ⓘ radical empiricism ⓘ |
| partOf | late works of William James ⓘ |
| philosophicalContext |
American pragmatism
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
early 20th-century analytic of experience ⓘ |
| philosophicalSchool |
pragmatism
ⓘ
radical empiricism ⓘ |
| philosophicalTheme |
critique of rationalism
ⓘ
empirical basis of knowledge ⓘ relation between experience and reality ⓘ status of relations in experience ⓘ |
| publicationMedium | book essay ⓘ |
| relatedWork |
Essays in Radical Empiricism
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Pragmatism NERFINISHED ⓘ The Meaning of Truth NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondsTo |
Mr. Pitkin
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
criticism of radical empiricism ⓘ |
| workIn | William James bibliography ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: A Reply to Mr. Pitkin Description of subject: "A Reply to Mr. Pitkin" is an essay by William James included in his collection *Essays in Radical Empiricism*, in which he defends and clarifies his philosophical position of radical empiricism against contemporary criticism.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.