Scientific Revolutions
E659171
"Scientific Revolutions" is a work by philosopher of science Ian Hacking that examines how major conceptual shifts transform scientific understanding and practice.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Scientific Revolutions canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7353207 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Scientific Revolutions Context triple: [Ian Hacking, notableWork, Scientific Revolutions]
-
A.
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions is a philosophical essay by Karl Popper in which he defends the rational character of scientific progress against relativistic and historicist interpretations of theory change.
-
B.
Scientific Thought
Scientific Thought is a major 1923 work of analytic philosophy by C. D. Broad that examines the nature of scientific knowledge, causation, and the structure of scientific theories.
-
C.
Scientific Revolution
The Scientific Revolution was a transformative period in early modern Europe marked by groundbreaking advances in astronomy, physics, and scientific methodology that fundamentally reshaped understandings of nature and laid the foundations for modern science.
-
D.
Victorian scientific revolution
The Victorian scientific revolution was a period in 19th-century Britain marked by rapid advances in science and technology, the professionalization of scientific disciplines, and profound shifts in how nature and society were understood.
-
E.
Copernican revolution in philosophy
The Copernican revolution in philosophy is Immanuel Kant’s radical shift that places the human mind and its a priori structures at the center of how objects are known, rather than assuming knowledge must conform to independently existing things.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Scientific Revolutions Target entity description: "Scientific Revolutions" is a work by philosopher of science Ian Hacking that examines how major conceptual shifts transform scientific understanding and practice.
-
A.
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions
The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions is a philosophical essay by Karl Popper in which he defends the rational character of scientific progress against relativistic and historicist interpretations of theory change.
-
B.
Scientific Thought
Scientific Thought is a major 1923 work of analytic philosophy by C. D. Broad that examines the nature of scientific knowledge, causation, and the structure of scientific theories.
-
C.
Scientific Revolution
The Scientific Revolution was a transformative period in early modern Europe marked by groundbreaking advances in astronomy, physics, and scientific methodology that fundamentally reshaped understandings of nature and laid the foundations for modern science.
-
D.
Victorian scientific revolution
The Victorian scientific revolution was a period in 19th-century Britain marked by rapid advances in science and technology, the professionalization of scientific disciplines, and profound shifts in how nature and society were understood.
-
E.
Copernican revolution in philosophy
The Copernican revolution in philosophy is Immanuel Kant’s radical shift that places the human mind and its a priori structures at the center of how objects are known, rather than assuming knowledge must conform to independently existing things.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (42)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
book
ⓘ
philosophy of science book ⓘ |
| addresses |
conceptual frameworks in science
ⓘ
continuity and discontinuity in science ⓘ nature of scientific rationality ⓘ role of paradigms in science ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
analyze conceptual transformation in science
ⓘ
clarify how scientific revolutions occur ⓘ |
| author | Ian Hacking NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| concerns |
interpretation of historical episodes in science
ⓘ
philosophical analysis of scientific change ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin | Canada ⓘ |
| describes | major conceptual shifts in science ⓘ |
| discusses |
anti-realism in science
ⓘ
scientific explanation and understanding ⓘ scientific realism ⓘ underdetermination of theory by data ⓘ |
| examines |
how conceptual shifts transform scientific practice
ⓘ
how conceptual shifts transform scientific understanding ⓘ |
| field |
history of science
ⓘ
philosophy of science ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
patterns of scientific development
ⓘ
structure of scientific change ⓘ |
| genre | philosophy of science ⓘ |
| hasAuthor | Ian Hacking NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasSubject |
scientific change
ⓘ
scientific explanation ⓘ scientific progress ⓘ scientific theories ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Thomas Kuhn NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainTopic |
conceptual change in science
ⓘ
history of science ⓘ scientific methodology ⓘ scientific practice ⓘ scientific revolutions ⓘ scientific understanding ⓘ theory change ⓘ |
| philosophicalDiscipline |
epistemology of science
ⓘ
metaphysics of science ⓘ |
| writtenBy | Ian Hacking NERFINISHED ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Scientific Revolutions Description of subject: "Scientific Revolutions" is a work by philosopher of science Ian Hacking that examines how major conceptual shifts transform scientific understanding and practice.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.