fall of Antioch in 1268
E592923
The fall of Antioch in 1268 was the Mamluk Sultan Baibars’ conquest and sack of the Crusader-held city of Antioch, marking a decisive blow to the remaining Crusader states in the Levant.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| fall of Antioch in 1268 canonical | 1 |
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
military conquest
ⓘ
sack of a city ⓘ siege ⓘ |
| causeOf |
increased isolation of remaining coastal Crusader cities
ⓘ
loss of a major Crusader stronghold in northern Syria ⓘ |
| conflict |
Crusades
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mamluk–Crusader wars NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| country | Mamluk Sultanate NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| describedBySource |
Latin Christian chronicles
ⓘ
medieval Arabic chronicles ⓘ |
| followedBy |
Mamluk conquest of Acre in 1291
ⓘ
Mamluk conquest of Tripoli NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| follows |
Battle of Ain Jalut
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Mongol invasions of Syria NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasCommander |
Baibars
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Bohemond VI of Antioch NERFINISHED ⓘ Simon Mansel NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasEffectOn |
Crusader presence in the Levant
ⓘ
relations between Mamluks and Mongols ⓘ trade routes in northern Syria ⓘ |
| hasLocation |
Antioch
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Levant NERFINISHED ⓘ Principality of Antioch NERFINISHED ⓘ northern Syria ⓘ |
| hasPart |
sack of Antioch in 1268
ⓘ
siege of Antioch in 1268 ⓘ |
| leader | Baibars NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| opponent |
Antiochene garrison
ⓘ
Bohemond VI of Antioch NERFINISHED ⓘ Latin Christian forces ⓘ |
| participant |
Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Crusader states NERFINISHED ⓘ Mamluk Sultanate NERFINISHED ⓘ Mongol Ilkhanate NERFINISHED ⓘ Principality of Antioch NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| partOf |
Baibars’ campaigns against the Crusader states
ⓘ
Mamluk expansion into the Levant NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| pointInTime |
1268
ⓘ
18 May 1268 ⓘ |
| result |
capture of Antioch by the Mamluks
ⓘ
decisive Mamluk victory ⓘ destruction and looting of Antioch ⓘ end of the Principality of Antioch as a territorial state ⓘ enslavement of many Antiochene inhabitants ⓘ massacre of inhabitants of Antioch ⓘ |
| significance |
demonstration of Baibars’ anti-Crusader policy
ⓘ
end of one of the oldest Crusader principalities ⓘ major blow to remaining Crusader states in the Levant ⓘ shift of regional power balance in favor of the Mamluks ⓘ |
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.