The Dying Art of Disagreement

E558703

The Dying Art of Disagreement is an essay by columnist Bret Stephens that argues for the importance of civil discourse, intellectual humility, and rigorous debate in a polarized society.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf essay
opinion piece
arguesFor importance of civil disagreement
intellectual modesty
tolerance of opposing viewpoints
value of open debate
author Bret Stephens NERFINISHED
criticizes echo chambers
ideological polarization
shouting down opposing views
tribalism in politics
emphasizes good-faith argument
importance of debate for democracy
listening to opponents
respect for dissent
focusesOn democratic norms
public discourse
university culture
genre cultural criticism
political commentary
intendedAudience general public
readers interested in politics and culture
language English
mainTheme civil discourse
intellectual humility
polarization in society
rigorous debate
positionOnDebate debate requires humility
debate sharpens ideas
positionOnDisagreement disagreement is essential for learning
disagreement should be conducted respectfully
positionOnHumility certainty should be held lightly
intellectual humility is a civic virtue
promotes civility in argument
engagement across differences
relatedConcept academic freedom
freedom of speech
liberal democracy
viewpoint diversity
stanceOnOpponents assume good faith in disagreement
opponents should be treated as adversaries not enemies
warnsAbout consequences of suppressing speech
dangers of intellectual conformity
erosion of democratic culture

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Bret Stephens notableWork The Dying Art of Disagreement