United States v. Chelsea Manning

E55666

United States v. Chelsea Manning was the high-profile court-martial of U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning for leaking classified documents to WikiLeaks, resulting in a landmark conviction under U.S. military and national security law.


Statements (48)
Predicate Object
instanceOf court-martial
criminal case
appliesTo Chelsea Manning
branchOfServiceOfDefendant United States Army
charge aiding the enemy
computer fraud-related offenses
theft of public records
violations of the Espionage Act of 1917
wrongful publication of national defense information
commutation sentence commuted by President Barack Obama
commutationDate 2017-01-17
country United States
court general court-martial
defendant Chelsea Manning
defendantStatusAtTime U.S. Army intelligence analyst
defenseCounsel David Coombs
civilian and military defense team
endDate 2013-08-21
judge Colonel Denise Lind
jurisdiction United States
United States Army
legalSignificance landmark application of the Espionage Act to leaks to the press
major case in U.S. military justice concerning whistleblowing and classified information
legalSystem United States federal law
United States military justice system
location Fort Meade, Maryland
outcome acquittal on the charge of aiding the enemy
conviction on multiple counts under the Espionage Act
plea guilty to some lesser included offenses
not guilty to aiding the enemy
prosecutionCounsel United States Army prosecutors
prosecutor United States Army
United States government
relatedTo Afghan War Diary leak
Guantánamo Bay files leak
Iraq War documents leak
United States diplomatic cables leak
WikiLeaks
releaseDate 2017-05-17
sentence 35 years imprisonment
dishonorable discharge
forfeiture of pay and allowances
reduction in rank to private (E-1)
startDate 2013-06-03
subjectMatter military intelligence activities
national security law
unauthorized disclosure of classified information
timePeriodOfOffense 2009–2010

Referenced by (1)
Subject (surface form when different) Predicate
Espionage Act of 1917
usedInCase

Please wait…