Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
E545538
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain is a landmark 1975 Indian Supreme Court case that scrutinized the validity of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election and significantly shaped constitutional limits on parliamentary power.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5738454 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain Context triple: [basic structure doctrine, usedInCase, Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain]
-
A.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
B.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
-
C.
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
-
D.
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
-
E.
Joseph Shine v. Union of India
Joseph Shine v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized adultery by striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional and discriminatory.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain Target entity description: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain is a landmark 1975 Indian Supreme Court case that scrutinized the validity of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election and significantly shaped constitutional limits on parliamentary power.
-
A.
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala is a landmark 1973 Supreme Court of India judgment that established the basic structure doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
-
B.
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized consensual same-sex relations by reading down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and affirming constitutional protections for LGBTQ+ rights.
-
C.
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India is a landmark Supreme Court of India case that examined environmental, displacement, and development issues surrounding large dam construction on the Narmada River.
-
D.
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India
Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India is a landmark 2017 Supreme Court of India judgment that unanimously affirmed the fundamental right to privacy under the Indian Constitution.
-
E.
Joseph Shine v. Union of India
Joseph Shine v. Union of India is a landmark 2018 Supreme Court of India judgment that decriminalized adultery by striking down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional and discriminatory.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Indian Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark constitutional law case ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | Indira Gandhi election case ⓘ |
| appliedDoctrine | basic structure doctrine NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| citationStatus | leading authority on constitutional amendments and elections in India ⓘ |
| concernsOffice | Prime Minister of India NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| constitutionalPrincipleInvolved |
democracy
ⓘ
rule of law ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ |
| country | India ⓘ |
| decisionYear | 1975 ⓘ |
| effect |
limited Parliament’s power to immunize elections from judicial review
ⓘ
reinforced the supremacy of the Constitution over parliamentary majority ⓘ struck down parts of the 39th Constitutional Amendment ⓘ |
| examinedProvision | Article 329A of the Constitution of India NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| heldThat |
Parliament cannot use its amending power to destroy the basic structure of the Constitution
ⓘ
free and fair elections are part of the basic structure of the Constitution ⓘ judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution ⓘ |
| historicalContext | decided during the Emergency in India (1975–1977) ⓘ |
| impact |
became a key precedent on the basic structure doctrine
ⓘ
shaped constitutional limits on parliamentary power in India ⓘ strengthened judicial independence in India ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | Supreme Court of India NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalArea |
constitutional law
ⓘ
election law ⓘ |
| originatedFrom | challenge to Indira Gandhi’s 1971 Lok Sabha election from Rae Bareli ⓘ |
| party |
Indira Gandhi
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Raj Narain NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedCase | Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedLegislation | 39th Constitutional Amendment of India NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Indira Gandhi
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Raj Narain NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
constitutional amendments
ⓘ
election law ⓘ limits on parliamentary power to amend the Constitution ⓘ validity of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain Description of subject: Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain is a landmark 1975 Indian Supreme Court case that scrutinized the validity of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election and significantly shaped constitutional limits on parliamentary power.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.