Avirodha Adhyaya
E473262
Avirodha Adhyaya is a major section of the Brahma Sutras that systematically reconciles and defends Vedantic doctrine against opposing philosophical views.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Avirodha Adhyaya canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4816744 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Avirodha Adhyaya Context triple: [Brahma Sutras, hasPart, Avirodha Adhyaya]
-
A.
Sangraha sub-parva
Sangraha sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that provides an overview and summary of the stories and events to be narrated in the larger work.
-
B.
Astika sub-parva
Astika sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that narrates the story of the sage Astika and the halting of King Janamejaya’s snake sacrifice.
-
C.
Āpaddharma Parva
Āpaddharma Parva is a section of the Mahabharata that discusses the ethical duties and moral conduct appropriate in times of crisis or distress.
-
D.
Chaitraratha sub-parva
Chaitraratha sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that narrates key early episodes in the Pandavas’ story, including encounters and events set around the celestial Chaitraratha forest.
-
E.
Anushasana Parva
Anushasana Parva is a book of the Indian epic Mahabharata that focuses on moral, social, and religious instructions delivered primarily through Bhishma’s teachings.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Avirodha Adhyaya Target entity description: Avirodha Adhyaya is a major section of the Brahma Sutras that systematically reconciles and defends Vedantic doctrine against opposing philosophical views.
-
A.
Sangraha sub-parva
Sangraha sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that provides an overview and summary of the stories and events to be narrated in the larger work.
-
B.
Viduragamana sub-parva
Viduragamana sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that narrates the visit of the wise counselor Vidura to the Kaurava court and his efforts to avert the impending conflict between the Kauravas and Pandavas.
-
C.
Astika sub-parva
Astika sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that narrates the story of the sage Astika and the halting of King Janamejaya’s snake sacrifice.
-
D.
Āpaddharma Parva
Āpaddharma Parva is a section of the Mahabharata that discusses the ethical duties and moral conduct appropriate in times of crisis or distress.
-
E.
Chaitraratha sub-parva
Chaitraratha sub-parva is a section of the Indian epic Mahabharata that narrates key early episodes in the Pandavas’ story, including encounters and events set around the celestial Chaitraratha forest.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
adhyaya
ⓘ
section of a religious text ⓘ |
| addressesSchool |
Buddhism
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Jainism NERFINISHED ⓘ Mimamsa NERFINISHED ⓘ Nyaya ⓘ Samkhya NERFINISHED ⓘ Vaisheshika NERFINISHED ⓘ Yoga NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
resolve apparent conflicts between scripture and reason
ⓘ
show non-contradiction of Vedantic doctrine ⓘ |
| belongsToWorkType | sutra literature ⓘ |
| chronologicalPlacement | composed in the first millennium BCE or early first millennium CE (traditional scholarly range for Brahma Sutras) ⓘ |
| etymology |
"Adhyaya" means chapter or section
ⓘ
"Avirodha" means non-contradiction or absence of opposition ⓘ |
| hasAuthorTraditionallyAttributed | Badarayana NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasCanonicalStatusIn |
Advaita Vedanta
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Dvaita Vedanta NERFINISHED ⓘ Vishishtadvaita Vedanta NERFINISHED ⓘ other Vedanta sub-schools ⓘ |
| hasMainTheme |
defense of Vedanta against objections
ⓘ
reconciliation of Vedantic doctrine with other philosophical systems ⓘ refutation of opposing philosophical views ⓘ |
| hasPhilosophicalFocus |
Brahman
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
nature of reality ⓘ relationship between Vedanta and other darshanas ⓘ |
| hasPositionInWork | second adhyaya of the Brahma Sutras ⓘ |
| hasPurpose |
to answer objections raised by rival philosophers
ⓘ
to demonstrate that Vedantic conclusions do not contradict valid means of knowledge ⓘ |
| isCommentedOnBy |
Adi Shankaracharya
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Baladeva Vidyabhushana NERFINISHED ⓘ Madhvacharya NERFINISHED ⓘ Nimbarkacharya NERFINISHED ⓘ Ramanujacharya NERFINISHED ⓘ Vallabhacharya NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| isSectionOf | Prasthanatrayi commentarial tradition ⓘ |
| partOf | Brahma Sutras NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| primaryLanguage | Sanskrit ⓘ |
| religiousTradition |
Hinduism
ⓘ
Vedanta NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| scripturalCategory | Vedanta sutra NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| textualFunction |
harmonization of Upanishadic statements
ⓘ
systematic refutation of rival interpretations of the Veda ⓘ |
| usesMethod |
dialectical argumentation
ⓘ
interpretation of Upanishadic passages ⓘ logical refutation of alternative theories ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Avirodha Adhyaya Description of subject: Avirodha Adhyaya is a major section of the Brahma Sutras that systematically reconciles and defends Vedantic doctrine against opposing philosophical views.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.