Brutus XVII

E408175

Brutus XVII is one of the later essays in the Anti-Federalist "Brutus" series, in which the author critiques the proposed U.S. Constitution’s judiciary and warns of the dangers of an overly powerful federal court system.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Brutus XVII canonical 2

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Anti-Federalist essay
pamphlet
political essay
argues broad constitutional clauses enable judicial expansion of power
federal courts will tend to enlarge their own jurisdiction
judges with life tenure will be insufficiently accountable
state courts will be subordinated to federal courts
the Supreme Court will be the final arbiter of the Constitution’s meaning
concerns danger of judicial supremacy
lack of effective checks on the federal judiciary
countryOfOrigin United States of America
surface form: United States
critiques Supreme Court’s potential power
proposed federal court system
genre political commentary
hasAuthor Brutus (pseudonymous Anti-Federalist writer)
hasLanguage English
hasPerspective Anti-Federalist
hasSubject United States Constitution
constitutional interpretation
federal judiciary
federalism
judicial power
judicial review
separation of powers
states’ rights
supremacy of federal law
historicalContext debates over ratification of the U.S. Constitution
influenced later discussions of judicial power in the United States
opposes strongly centralized national judiciary
partOf Anti-Federalist Papers
Letters of Brutus
surface form: Brutus essays
politicalAlignment states’ rights orientation
primaryConcern protection of liberty against judicial overreach
publicationPeriod 1787–1788
relatedTo Anti-Federalist critiques of judicial review
Article III of the United States Constitution
The Federalist Papers
surface form: Federalist Papers
supports a more limited federal judiciary
retention of significant judicial authority by the states
warnsAbout consolidation of power in the national government
erosion of state sovereignty
judges interpreting the Constitution according to their own will
judicial encroachment on legislative power
overly powerful federal judiciary

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.