United States v. Wurie
E1201250
UNEXPLORED
United States v. Wurie is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside Riley v. California, held that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Wurie canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205773 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Wurie Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, United States v. Wurie]
-
A.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
B.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
C.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
D.
United States v. Warshak
United States v. Warshak is a landmark Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that the government generally must obtain a warrant to access the contents of emails stored by a service provider, significantly shaping Fourth Amendment protections for electronic communications.
-
E.
United States v. Henry
United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Wurie Target entity description: United States v. Wurie is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside Riley v. California, held that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
-
A.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
B.
United States v. Basye
United States v. Basye is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the tax treatment of income assigned to others, particularly in the context of professional partnerships and deferred compensation arrangements.
-
C.
United States v. Bajakajian
United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
-
D.
United States v. Warshak
United States v. Warshak is a landmark Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decision holding that the government generally must obtain a warrant to access the contents of emails stored by a service provider, significantly shaping Fourth Amendment protections for electronic communications.
-
E.
United States v. Henry
United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.