Daimler AG v. Bauman
E1201245
UNEXPLORED
Daimler AG v. Bauman is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited the scope of general personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations in American courts.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Daimler AG v. Bauman canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205766 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Daimler AG v. Bauman Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Daimler AG v. Bauman]
-
A.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
-
B.
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. is a landmark 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements for international commercial disputes, including antitrust claims.
-
C.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
-
D.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
-
E.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the extraterritorial application of the Alien Tort Statute in human rights lawsuits against corporations for conduct occurring abroad.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Daimler AG v. Bauman Target entity description: Daimler AG v. Bauman is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited the scope of general personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations in American courts.
-
A.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
-
B.
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. is a landmark 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements for international commercial disputes, including antitrust claims.
-
C.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.
Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the validity of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the Rules Enabling Act and helped define the scope of federal procedural rulemaking.
-
D.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
-
E.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the extraterritorial application of the Alien Tort Statute in human rights lawsuits against corporations for conduct occurring abroad.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.