Abramski v. United States
E1201242
UNEXPLORED
Abramski v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a person violates federal law by making a “straw purchase” of a firearm for someone else while falsely claiming to be the actual buyer on required federal forms.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Abramski v. United States canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205762 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Abramski v. United States Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Abramski v. United States]
-
A.
Abrams v. United States
Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
-
B.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
C.
Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Armstrong v. United States
Armstrong v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that forms part of the Insular Cases, addressing the constitutional rights and legal status of territories acquired by the United States.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Abramski v. United States Target entity description: Abramski v. United States is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a person violates federal law by making a “straw purchase” of a firearm for someone else while falsely claiming to be the actual buyer on required federal forms.
-
A.
Abrams v. United States
Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
-
B.
Reynolds v. United States
Reynolds v. United States is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the distinction between protected religious belief and regulable religiously motivated conduct, holding that the Free Exercise Clause does not excuse individuals from compliance with otherwise valid criminal laws such as those banning polygamy.
-
C.
Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
-
D.
Wright v. United States
Wright v. United States is a 1938 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of presidential veto power and the constitutional requirements for lawmaking under the Presentment Clause.
-
E.
Armstrong v. United States
Armstrong v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that forms part of the Insular Cases, addressing the constitutional rights and legal status of territories acquired by the United States.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.