Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
E1201241
UNEXPLORED
Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing whether a pro-life advocacy group could challenge an Ohio law regulating false statements in political campaigns under the First Amendment.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205761 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus]
-
A.
United States v. Susan B. Anthony
United States v. Susan B. Anthony was the landmark 1873 federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, spotlighting the legal barriers to women's suffrage in the United States.
-
B.
Minor v. Happersett
Minor v. Happersett was an 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote, rejecting the argument that suffrage was a privilege of national citizenship.
-
C.
Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
-
D.
Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.
-
E.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus Target entity description: Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing whether a pro-life advocacy group could challenge an Ohio law regulating false statements in political campaigns under the First Amendment.
-
A.
United States v. Susan B. Anthony
United States v. Susan B. Anthony was the landmark 1873 federal criminal case in which suffragist Susan B. Anthony was prosecuted and convicted for illegally voting, spotlighting the legal barriers to women's suffrage in the United States.
-
B.
Minor v. Happersett
Minor v. Happersett was an 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Constitution did not grant women the right to vote, rejecting the argument that suffrage was a privilege of national citizenship.
-
C.
Bradlaugh v. Gossett
Bradlaugh v. Gossett is an 1884 English constitutional law case that established the principle that courts cannot interfere with the internal proceedings of Parliament.
-
D.
Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case
The Virginia Minor women’s suffrage case was an 1870s U.S. Supreme Court legal challenge in which suffragist Virginia Minor argued that the 14th Amendment guaranteed women the right to vote, a claim the Court ultimately rejected.
-
E.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.