Fernandez v. California
E1201236
UNEXPLORED
Fernandez v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police may conduct a warrantless search of a home with the consent of one occupant even if another occupant previously objected but is no longer present.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Fernandez v. California canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16205755 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fernandez v. California Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, Fernandez v. California]
-
A.
Navarette v. California
Navarette v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that an anonymous 911 tip about dangerous driving can provide reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
-
B.
Bridges v. California
Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
-
C.
Gilbert v. California
Gilbert v. California is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a defendant’s post-indictment lineup identification without counsel present violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
-
D.
Riley v. California
Riley v. California is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
-
E.
Griffin v. California
Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Fernandez v. California Target entity description: Fernandez v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held police may conduct a warrantless search of a home with the consent of one occupant even if another occupant previously objected but is no longer present.
-
A.
Navarette v. California
Navarette v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that an anonymous 911 tip about dangerous driving can provide reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
-
B.
Bridges v. California
Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
-
C.
Gilbert v. California
Gilbert v. California is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a defendant’s post-indictment lineup identification without counsel present violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
-
D.
Riley v. California
Riley v. California is a landmark 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that police generally must obtain a warrant before searching digital information on a cell phone seized during an arrest.
-
E.
Griffin v. California
Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.