United States v. Castleman

Target entity: United States v. Castleman
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, United States v. Castleman]

• A. United States v. Eichman
  United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
• B. Kastigar v. United States
  Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
• C. United States v. Patane
  United States v. Patane is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule by holding that physical evidence obtained as a result of unwarned but voluntary statements is admissible despite a Miranda violation.
• D. United States v. Bajakajian
  United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
• E. United States v. Henry
  United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: United States v. Castleman
Target entity description: United States v. Castleman is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the definition of “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” for purposes of federal firearm possession prohibitions.

• A. United States v. Eichman
  United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
• B. Kastigar v. United States
  Kastigar v. United States is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the government may compel testimony from a witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment by granting use and derivative-use immunity, which is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination.
• C. United States v. Patane
  United States v. Patane is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule by holding that physical evidence obtained as a result of unwarned but voluntary statements is admissible despite a Miranda violation.
• D. United States v. Bajakajian
  United States v. Bajakajian is a 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case that held, for the first time, that a criminal forfeiture could violate the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause if it is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense.
• E. United States v. Henry
  United States v. Henry is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the Sixth Amendment right to counsel by limiting the government’s use of jailhouse informants to deliberately elicit incriminating statements from indicted defendants.
• F. None of above. chosen