American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

Target entity: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.]

• A. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
  FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the FCC’s authority to change its indecency enforcement policies under a deferential standard of judicial review for agency policy shifts.
• B. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
  AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
• C. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
  FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
• D. United States v. AT&T
  United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
• E. MCI v. AT&T
  MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.
Target entity description: American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held Aereo’s internet-based television streaming service violated broadcasters’ public performance rights under copyright law.

• A. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
  FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the FCC’s authority to change its indecency enforcement policies under a deferential standard of judicial review for agency policy shifts.
• B. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
  AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state laws that deem class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unconscionable, thereby strengthening the enforceability of mandatory individual arbitration clauses.
• C. FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
  FCC v. Pacifica Foundation is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the government's authority to regulate indecent material on public airwaves, stemming from a radio broadcast of George Carlin's "Seven Dirty Words" monologue.
• D. United States v. AT&T
  United States v. AT&T was a landmark antitrust lawsuit in which the U.S. government forced the breakup of the Bell System telecommunications monopoly in the early 1980s.
• E. MCI v. AT&T
  MCI v. AT&T was a landmark U.S. antitrust lawsuit in the telecommunications industry that challenged AT&T’s monopoly and helped open the long-distance market to competition.
• F. None of above. chosen