Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph
E1194056
UNEXPLORED
Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act even when they are silent on the costs of arbitration.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16115527 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph Context triple: [American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, relatedCase, Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph]
-
A.
Colegrove v. Green
Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
-
B.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
C.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
D.
NAACP v. Alabama
NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
-
E.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph Target entity description: Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act even when they are silent on the costs of arbitration.
-
A.
Colegrove v. Green
Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
-
B.
Alabama v. Shelton
Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
-
C.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
D.
NAACP v. Alabama
NAACP v. Alabama is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that strengthened constitutional protections for freedom of association by preventing states from forcing advocacy groups to disclose their membership lists.
-
E.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
→
relatedCase
→
Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph
ⓘ