Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Target entity: Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Context triple: [American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, relatedCase, Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.]

• A. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
  Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
• B. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• C. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court administrative law case that clarified the "arbitrary and capricious" standard for judicial review of agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
  United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.
Target entity description: Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. is a landmark 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the enforceability of arbitration agreements for international commercial disputes, including antitrust claims.

• A. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
  Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
• B. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• C. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court administrative law case that clarified the "arbitrary and capricious" standard for judicial review of agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
  United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
• F. None of above. chosen