Missouri v. Frye
E1194033
UNEXPLORED
Missouri v. Frye is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal plea offers to a criminal defendant as part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Missouri v. Frye canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16115237 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Missouri v. Frye Context triple: [October Term 2011, heardCase, Missouri v. Frye]
-
A.
Missouri v. Seibert
Missouri v. Seibert is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited police use of "question-first, warn-later" interrogation tactics by strengthening Miranda protections for suspects.
-
B.
Missouri v. McNeely
Missouri v. McNeely is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant for nonconsensual blood draws in drunk-driving investigations, rejecting a per se rule based on the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream.
-
C.
Cummings v. Missouri
Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
-
D.
Adair v. United States
Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
-
E.
Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Missouri v. Frye Target entity description: Missouri v. Frye is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defense counsel has a duty to communicate formal plea offers to a criminal defendant as part of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.
-
A.
Missouri v. Seibert
Missouri v. Seibert is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited police use of "question-first, warn-later" interrogation tactics by strengthening Miranda protections for suspects.
-
B.
Missouri v. McNeely
Missouri v. McNeely is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourth Amendment generally requires a warrant for nonconsensual blood draws in drunk-driving investigations, rejecting a per se rule based on the natural dissipation of alcohol in the bloodstream.
-
C.
Cummings v. Missouri
Cummings v. Missouri was an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down post–Civil War loyalty oath requirements as unconstitutional bills of attainder and ex post facto laws.
-
D.
Adair v. United States
Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
-
E.
Moore v. Illinois
Moore v. Illinois is a United States Supreme Court decision addressing constitutional criminal procedure issues, particularly concerning the rights of defendants in state prosecutions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.