United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al.
E1180984
UNEXPLORED
United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal prosecuting SS Einsatzgruppen leaders for mass murder and crimes against humanity committed in Eastern Europe.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T15874917 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al. Context triple: [Einsatzgruppen Trial, alsoKnownAs, United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al.]
-
A.
United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al.
United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted German officers for war crimes committed in the Balkans, particularly involving hostage-taking and reprisals against civilians.
-
B.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
-
E.
United States v. Sokolow
United States v. Sokolow is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, particularly in the context of drug courier profiling and investigative stops.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al. Target entity description: United States of America v. Otto Ohlendorf et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal prosecuting SS Einsatzgruppen leaders for mass murder and crimes against humanity committed in Eastern Europe.
-
A.
United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al.
United States of America v. Wilhelm List et al. was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted German officers for war crimes committed in the Balkans, particularly involving hostage-taking and reprisals against civilians.
-
B.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
C.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
D.
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
-
E.
United States v. Sokolow
United States v. Sokolow is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the standard for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment, particularly in the context of drug courier profiling and investigative stops.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.