Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro

Target entity: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
Context triple: [Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., subsequentCitationBy, Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro]

• A. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• B. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court administrative law case that clarified the "arbitrary and capricious" standard for judicial review of agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.
• C. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
  Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
  Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro
Target entity description: Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of Fair Labor Standards Act exemptions for automobile dealership service advisors.

• A. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
  MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
• B. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
  Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court administrative law case that clarified the "arbitrary and capricious" standard for judicial review of agency rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act.
• C. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
  Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted the definition of "disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act, prompting Congress to later broaden that definition through the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
• D. California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
  California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the limits of First Amendment petitioning rights when parties allegedly use governmental and judicial processes as part of an anticompetitive scheme in violation of antitrust laws.
• E. Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
  Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that held public employees’ lawsuits and grievances are protected by the Petition Clause only when they address matters of public concern.
• F. None of above. chosen