Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong
E1031536
"Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong" is a philosophical work by Jerry Fodor that critiques mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts and argues for a more modular, language-of-thought-based account of the mind.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T13269471 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong Context triple: [Jerry Fodor, notableWork, Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong]
-
A.
Unified Theories of Cognition
Unified Theories of Cognition is a comprehensive cognitive science framework proposed by Allen Newell that seeks to explain diverse mental processes—such as problem solving, memory, and learning—within a single, unified theoretical architecture.
-
B.
The Concept of Mind
The Concept of Mind is a 1949 philosophical work by Gilbert Ryle that critiques Cartesian dualism and introduces the idea of mental concepts as dispositions rather than inner ghostly states.
-
C.
How the Mind Works
How the Mind Works is a popular science book by cognitive scientist Steven Pinker that explores human thought and behavior through the lenses of evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience.
-
D.
The Large, the Small and the Human Mind
The Large, the Small and the Human Mind is a philosophical and scientific book exploring the nature of reality, consciousness, and the relationship between quantum mechanics, cosmology, and human understanding.
-
E.
The Rediscovery of the Mind
The Rediscovery of the Mind is a philosophical work by John Searle that critiques computational and reductionist theories of consciousness and argues for a biologically grounded account of the mind.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong Target entity description: "Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong" is a philosophical work by Jerry Fodor that critiques mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts and argues for a more modular, language-of-thought-based account of the mind.
-
A.
Unified Theories of Cognition
Unified Theories of Cognition is a comprehensive cognitive science framework proposed by Allen Newell that seeks to explain diverse mental processes—such as problem solving, memory, and learning—within a single, unified theoretical architecture.
-
B.
The Concept of Mind
The Concept of Mind is a 1949 philosophical work by Gilbert Ryle that critiques Cartesian dualism and introduces the idea of mental concepts as dispositions rather than inner ghostly states.
-
C.
How the Mind Works
How the Mind Works is a popular science book by cognitive scientist Steven Pinker that explores human thought and behavior through the lenses of evolutionary psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience.
-
D.
The Large, the Small and the Human Mind
The Large, the Small and the Human Mind is a philosophical and scientific book exploring the nature of reality, consciousness, and the relationship between quantum mechanics, cosmology, and human understanding.
-
E.
The Rediscovery of the Mind
The Rediscovery of the Mind is a philosophical work by John Searle that critiques computational and reductionist theories of consciousness and argues for a biologically grounded account of the mind.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
book
ⓘ
non-fiction book ⓘ philosophical work ⓘ |
| arguesFor |
atomistic theory of concepts
ⓘ
informational semantics for concepts ⓘ innateness of many concepts ⓘ |
| author |
Jerry A. Fodor
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Jerry Fodor NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| critiques |
connectionist accounts of concepts
ⓘ
exemplar theories of concepts ⓘ mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts ⓘ prototype theories of concepts ⓘ theory-theory accounts of concepts ⓘ |
| field |
cognitive science
ⓘ
philosophy ⓘ philosophy of psychology ⓘ |
| genre | analytic philosophy ⓘ |
| hasForm | monograph ⓘ |
| hasPerspective |
nativist view of the mind
ⓘ
representational theory of mind ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
Jerry Fodor’s earlier work on the language of thought
ⓘ
modularity theory ⓘ |
| influences |
debates on cognitive architecture
ⓘ
debates on the nature of concepts ⓘ philosophy of cognitive science ⓘ |
| intendedAudience |
cognitive scientists
ⓘ
philosophers of mind ⓘ philosophers of psychology ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainTopic |
Fodor’s theory of concepts
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
cognitive science ⓘ concepts ⓘ language of thought ⓘ mental representation ⓘ modularity of mind ⓘ philosophy of cognitive science ⓘ philosophy of mind ⓘ |
| opposes |
empiricist theories of concepts
ⓘ
holistic theories of conceptual content ⓘ |
| philosophicalTradition | analytic philosophy of mind ⓘ |
| relatedWork |
Psychosemantics
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
The Language of Thought NERFINISHED ⓘ The Modularity of Mind NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| supports |
language-of-thought hypothesis
ⓘ
modular view of the mind ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong Description of subject: "Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong" is a philosophical work by Jerry Fodor that critiques mainstream cognitive science theories of concepts and argues for a more modular, language-of-thought-based account of the mind.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.