Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery
E1014394
Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery is a provision in the Philippine Rules of Court that prescribes the sanctions and remedies available when a party or witness fails or refuses to obey discovery procedures in civil actions.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T12964235 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery Context triple: [Rules of Court of the Philippines, contains, Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery]
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is the provision that sets out special pleading requirements in U.S. federal civil cases, including heightened specificity for matters such as fraud, mistake, and special damages.
-
C.
Rule 603
Rule 603 is a rule of evidence that requires witnesses to declare they will testify truthfully before giving testimony in court.
-
D.
Rule 23
Rule 23 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs how and when a criminal defendant’s case is tried by a jury or by a judge alone.
-
E.
Rule 56
Rule 56 is the provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that governs summary judgment, allowing courts to decide cases without trial when there is no genuine dispute of material fact.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery Target entity description: Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery is a provision in the Philippine Rules of Court that prescribes the sanctions and remedies available when a party or witness fails or refuses to obey discovery procedures in civil actions.
-
A.
Rule 403
Rule 403 is a key evidentiary rule in U.S. law that allows courts to exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time.
-
B.
Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 9 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is the provision that sets out special pleading requirements in U.S. federal civil cases, including heightened specificity for matters such as fraud, mistake, and special damages.
-
C.
Rule 603
Rule 603 is a rule of evidence that requires witnesses to declare they will testify truthfully before giving testimony in court.
-
D.
Rule 23
Rule 23 is a provision of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that governs how and when a criminal defendant’s case is tried by a jury or by a judge alone.
-
E.
Rule 56
Rule 56 is the provision in the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that governs summary judgment, allowing courts to decide cases without trial when there is no genuine dispute of material fact.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Philippine civil procedure rule
ⓘ
procedural rule ⓘ rule of court ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
ensure compliance with discovery procedures
ⓘ
prevent abuse of discovery process ⓘ promote efficient disposition of civil cases ⓘ |
| appliesTo |
civil actions
ⓘ
parties ⓘ witnesses ⓘ |
| bindingOn | trial courts in civil cases ⓘ |
| covers |
remedies for non-compliance with discovery
ⓘ
sanctions for non-compliance with discovery ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | Philippines NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| legalBasisFor | motions for sanctions due to discovery violations ⓘ |
| legalSystem | Philippine legal system NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| partOf | Philippine Rules of Court NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| providesFor |
arrest of a party who refuses to obey an order for physical or mental examination
ⓘ
contempt sanctions for refusal to be sworn or to answer ⓘ dismissing the action or any part thereof ⓘ expenses and attorney’s fees caused by refusal to comply ⓘ orders compelling discovery ⓘ refusal to allow disobedient party to support or oppose designated claims or defenses ⓘ rendering judgment by default ⓘ staying further proceedings ⓘ striking out pleadings ⓘ taking facts to be established in accordance with the claim of the party obtaining the order ⓘ |
| regulates |
failure to obey discovery orders
ⓘ
refusal to comply with discovery procedures ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Rule 23 – Depositions Pending Action
ⓘ
Rule 24 – Depositions Before Action or Pending Appeal ⓘ Rule 25 – Interrogatories to Parties NERFINISHED ⓘ Rule 26 – Admission by Adverse Party ⓘ Rule 27 – Production or Inspection of Documents or Things ⓘ Rule 28 – Physical and Mental Examination of Persons ⓘ modes of discovery ⓘ |
| sourceOf | court authority to impose discovery-related sanctions ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery Description of subject: Rule 29 – Refusal to Comply with Modes of Discovery is a provision in the Philippine Rules of Court that prescribes the sanctions and remedies available when a party or witness fails or refuses to obey discovery procedures in civil actions.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.